During the recent cooperation with customers, our customers recorded more than 3900 sets of data for further analysis of the reliability of metal detectors and further quality control management and improvement.
So far, there have been more than 6000 reliable detections in total. And the most important thing is that these 6000 times are continuous, without interruption, and not cumulative.
We make further analysis based on enough sample data obtained, rather than simply statistics of historical records that have occurred!
This is what distinguishes us from almost all brand metal detectors.
In other words, based on limited sample data, we can evaluate the reliability of the equipment in the longer term.
Since we are working with current customers to improve, a total of 30,000 times is just our first phase goal.
What we have achieved so far is continuous, uninterrupted, continuous 3 years, 260,000 times.
We think this is almost certainly the world standard in this field.
We also found a more peculiar phenomenon, that is, SS( stainless steel ) is more susceptible to product effects, while Fe has almost no effect, but we do not know whether this is a common phenomenon.
If you see here and are willing to share your experience and knowledge with each other, we look forward to receiving your response( email@example.com ).
This is the risk analysis of missed detection of standard metal test ball:
1, Based on the same equipment, metal ball size, parameters and environment etc;
2, The products are basically the same in nature and different in shape;
3, This is the effect of different temperatures;
4, We can't explain this phenomenon now, and data analysis shows the difference.
5, We are also confused about this issue, if you are interested, look forward to hearing from you: firstname.lastname@example.org